Recent Posts

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10
21
Patient Billing / Re: HELP PLEASE! Primary/Secondary and Patient Responsibility
« Last post by PMRNC on October 17, 2017, 08:45:07 AM »
Quote
Total charges $110: BCBS (primary): Allowable $45 (went towards deductible) - Patient Responsibility $85 - Paid $0
 1199-Aetna (secondary): Allowable $35 - Patient Responsibility $0 - Paid $35

I slept on this one, and after few cups coffee. In one of the posts I think you said the patient's plan only allowed $45  you were adjusting off the $40 spinal charge..why is that? Just because the carrier didn't allow it doesn't mean you cannot bill the patient. That is why they show $85 as PR, then secondary comes into play and they pay $35. Can you break down the secondary EOB for me a bit better with each charge, secondary allowable per charge and any remarks on the EOB? The patient should STILL have to meet cost-sharing with the primary (you said secondary $0 copay $0 ded) and secondary paid $35 BUT the carrier is making patient responsible for the other $40 so you shouldn't have to write that off. The secondary didn't allow it all so need to know WHY? The way I calculate this patient owes $50 because of the $85 the primary says is owed, the secondary paid $35 of it making patient have to pay $50 

I think what is confusing you might be that you think all $0 allowable is a par adjustment and that's not so. The adjustment is the difference between the billed charge and the allowable amount due to the contractual discount. A zero allowable could be a "non" covered service which is why I'd like to see the secondary's breakdown and any remarks on it. Without the secondary plan the patient is responsible for $85 ($45 which was allowable they put towards deductible and the other $40 is "non covered" under patient plan) 

This might be an error on secondary plan's part. If you want to de-identify both EOB's and send to me I'll take a look if you want. Otherwise just post the breakdown of the secondary along with any remarks on the EOB that might explain why they say PR = $0  my email is linda@billerswebsite.com
22
Yes,  Exactly! That is probably the first thing the patient will point out if billed $10 per visit. (There are multiple visits with this scenario).
23
Patient Billing / Re: HELP PLEASE! Primary/Secondary and Patient Responsibility
« Last post by PMRNC on October 16, 2017, 08:45:04 PM »
Quote
This is a great topic.  It isn't something that comes up terribly often but when it does it is always a debate.  I know it goes by COB method but I'm still hung up on the fact that the secondary is saying $0 PR.

Well, the secondary paid $35... so yes I'm also hung up on on the $0 responsibility with secondary.   It would help tremendously if we had a full break down of charges and both primary / secondary allowable, payments.



24
Patient Billing / Re: HELP PLEASE! Primary/Secondary and Patient Responsibility
« Last post by Michele on October 16, 2017, 06:31:55 PM »
$10 as they owe the copay from secondary :)


But doesn't that violate the contract with Aetna (1199)?

This is a great topic.  It isn't something that comes up terribly often but when it does it is always a debate.  I know it goes by COB method but I'm still hung up on the fact that the secondary is saying $0 PR.
25
In my second post I stated that BCBS calculates non-covered charges as patient responsibility therefore they included the extra spinal charge of $40, plus the deductible charge/max per visit of $45 which went towards the deductible and that equals $85.

We are adjusting off the $40 extra spinal charge. Neither insurance considered it as an allowable expense therefore it should not be patient responsibility as per NAIC. Either way, the primary insurance only allows a max of $45 per visit no matter what the total charge. That leaves the following calculations I most recently laid out.


BCBS (primary): Total charges $115 - Allowable  $45  - (went towards deductible)- Patient responsibility $45 - Ins. Paid $0 <Benefits include $500 deduct which isn't met and $45 max per visit>

Aetna (1199-secondary): Allowable $35  - Patient responsibility $0 -Ins. Paid $35 <Benefits include $0 deduct  $0 copay>
26
Patient Billing / Re: HELP PLEASE! Primary/Secondary and Patient Responsibility
« Last post by PMRNC on October 16, 2017, 06:03:28 PM »
Somewhere there is a mistake in the original post. The PRIMARY allowed $45 but says patient responsibility is $85 so there is a discrepancy there. Since you say full charges were $110, I'm assuming that the allowable would have been $110 with $45 being applied to deductible leaving patient with $85 balance. (Again, I can't confirm this because there is a big discrepancy with the allowable and the primary payment).   Then.. again going by your original post, secondary only allowed $35 and paid $35. 

I don't want to assume in case you made an error in your original post, but there is def a problem with primary EOB with them allowing $45, applying $45 to deductible and saying patient is responsible for $85. That is where the problem lies.




Quote
Total charges $110: BCBS (primary): Allowable $45 (went towards deductible) - Patient Responsibility $85 - Paid $0
                                        1199-Aetna (secondary): Allowable $35 - Patient Responsibility $0 - Paid $35

Adjustment is $65  (higher allowable of $110-$45)    Primary payment $0. Secondary Payment $35
27
The secondary benefits include $0 copay and they also stated that the patient should not have any financial responsibility on the EOB and even when I called and asked them which COB method they used to process the claim.

Patient's plan only allowed a maximum of $45 per chiropractic visit. We billed 3 services: Spinal manipulation-->billed $50, allowed $36, mechanical traction---> billed $25, allowed $9, and also billed extra spinal adjustment $40, allowed $0 which we thought was on the secondary's fee schedule and they would pick it up as an allowable expense. That is why there is a big difference in total charge and allowable.

Michelle, I'm with you! I understand the calculations now but there is still conflicting answers on which is the correct fee schedule to follow.
28
Patient Billing / Re: HELP PLEASE! Primary/Secondary and Patient Responsibility
« Last post by PMRNC on October 16, 2017, 03:48:53 PM »
$10 as they owe the copay from secondary :)

but again.. curious .. why was allowable only $45 on $110 charge?
29
Patient Billing / Re: HELP PLEASE! Primary/Secondary and Patient Responsibility
« Last post by Michele on October 16, 2017, 03:25:47 PM »
Quote

According to your method, the patient would owe $10 I believe. If I was to honor both contracts or follow the lower fee schedule, the patient would $0.

BINGO.. you got it. :) 


So now I'm confused.....which is correct?
30
Patient Billing / Re: HELP PLEASE! Primary/Secondary and Patient Responsibility
« Last post by PMRNC on October 16, 2017, 02:34:53 PM »
Quote
BCBS lists charges which should actually be adjusted off as patient responsibility which is why the PR was greater than the allowable. I am not sure why they have been doing this on our EOR's as we are participating but I am going to disregard that and adjust it off. Here is what it should be:

BCBS (primary): Total charges $115 - Allowable  $45  - (went towards deductible)- Patient responsibility - $45 - Paid $0 <Benefits include $500 deduct which isn't met and $45 max per visit>

Aetna (1199-secondary): Allowable $35  - Patient responsibility $0 - Paid $35 <Benefits include $0 deduct  $0 copay>

According to your method, the patient would owe $10 I believe. If I was to honor both contracts or follow the lower fee schedule, the patient would $0.

BINGO.. you got it. :) 

BUT.. on a side note.. I really want to know why of $115 the primary only allowed $45.
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10