Medical Billing Forum
Medical Billing Forum - Get all of your billing & coding questions answered here!
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email
?
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
News:
How to Complete CMS 1500 Forms
- Quickly & Easily Learn How To Fill Out CMS 1500 Forms Step by Step ...With No More Guess Work![/size]
Home
Help
Search
Login
Register
Medical Billing Forum
»
Billing
»
Billing
(Moderators:
Alice Scott
,
Michele
) »
Appropriate/proper 59 modifier usage
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
2
Author
Topic: Appropriate/proper 59 modifier usage (Read 18772 times)
MedBiller
Newbie
Posts: 3
Appropriate/proper 59 modifier usage
«
on:
August 30, 2010, 11:15:12 PM »
As usual, thanks for any assistance provided...
Need clarification regarding infamous "modifier 59"
I understand that it represents a procedure that is distinct or independent from other services performed on the same date. When appropriate; I have used it in the following scenario: E/M service with modifier 25 and 96372 with modifier 59. If applicable, How would I utilize it properly when billing the following? Can I use it more than one?
99214 w/ mod 25 (office visit level 4)
36415 (vein.)
85025 (CBC)
96365 (initial hour non-chemo infusion)
96366 X 2 (additional hours non chemo infusion)
96367 (Subsequent hours non chemo infusion)
96361 (additional hours hydration)
96372 (B12 injection)
I was taught to place the 59 modifier on the primary procedure code only (96365), but I believe that might be incorrect. Thanks!
Logged
Michele
Administrator
Hero Member
Posts: 5927
Re: Appropriate/proper 59 modifier usage
«
Reply #1 on:
August 31, 2010, 11:32:24 AM »
I am not a certified coder so I am not sure. IMO, the 59 modifier is not needed since you are using the 25 on the E&M. However, I am wondering if you are a coder. If you are not, shouldn't the charges be coming over to you with the modifiers indicated by the provider? Just wondered.
Michele
Logged
Sign Up for our FREE
Medical Billing Newsletter
Get a 10% discount on
Medical Billing Products
by using Coupon Code: 10OFF
http://www.solutions-medical-billing.com
medauthor
Full Member
Posts: 129
Re: Appropriate/proper 59 modifier usage
«
Reply #2 on:
August 31, 2010, 12:54:58 PM »
I am going with Michele here....but take a look at what CMS says
https://www.cms.gov/MLNMattersArticles/downloads/SE0715.pdf
Logged
Michelle Rimmer, CHI, CPMB
President-Professional Medical Billers Association
Owner-ABA Therapy Billing Services
Author, 'Medical Billing 101' and 'Coding Basics: Understanding Medical Collections
oneround
Full Member
Posts: 226
Re: Appropriate/proper 59 modifier usage
«
Reply #3 on:
August 31, 2010, 01:43:36 PM »
The ladies have given somne really good points here. i would let your coder handle this and and I say this because mod. 59 is a highly misused modifier and has been abused big time by many. This mod. is highley subceptible to audits and was a main focus point for the OIG at one time. Mod. 59 does not have to be coded on the primary procedure but is placed on the code that is usually bundled into the primary procedure. Again, this is a high profile modifier and as the ladies stated
THER/PROPH/DIAG INJ, SC/IM M 96372 is a component of Column 1 code 96365 but a modifier is allowed in order to differentiate between the services provided (Again when in doubt-send it back to the coder to cehck it out)
Logged
Michael A. Reynolds, CPC, CCP-P, CPMB, OS
Project Manager
Corporate Compliance
Sharp HealthCare
medauthor
Full Member
Posts: 129
Re: Appropriate/proper 59 modifier usage
«
Reply #4 on:
August 31, 2010, 04:40:14 PM »
Quote
96372 (B12 injection)
I just realized....where is your J3420? Is this on your claim, as well?
Logged
Michelle Rimmer, CHI, CPMB
President-Professional Medical Billers Association
Owner-ABA Therapy Billing Services
Author, 'Medical Billing 101' and 'Coding Basics: Understanding Medical Collections
Medical Billing Forum
Re: Appropriate/proper 59 modifier usage
«
Reply #4 on:
August 31, 2010, 04:40:14 PM »
MedBiller
Newbie
Posts: 3
Re: Appropriate/proper 59 modifier usage
«
Reply #5 on:
August 31, 2010, 08:15:25 PM »
Thank you for all your responses. My apologies for posting this in the billing vs. coding section.
In doing my own research, it has become apparent that I am in a unique situation. I'm employed as a medical biller for a specialist group who keeps their billing in house. Having no formal training, I was taught on the job by my peers. It has come to my attention, that there are certain aspects to my training that are lacking in regards to the proper way to bill, hence my request for assistance. We also are responsible for the coding of our claims. I hadn't realized how outlandish this all was until I started utilizing your forum. So, please bare with me and my questions, for I am just trying to educate myself.
With that being said, there is no coder to consult.
I did neglect to include the J3420, if we are providing it, then yes, I do bill for it, however there are times when the patient brings their own supply.
Logged
PMRNC
Hero Member
Posts: 4562
Re: Appropriate/proper 59 modifier usage
«
Reply #6 on:
September 01, 2010, 09:49:54 PM »
If there is no coder the claims should get sent to the doctor to code. He is in there with the patient, he should either be coding himself or hire an on-staff coder. Whether you are an employee or not will not negate the liability you will have for any problems down the road..I would definitely go to your office manager and explain that you are uncomfortable with the coding.
Logged
Linda Walker
Practice Managers Resource & Networking Community
One Stop Resources, Education and Networking for Medical Billers
www.billerswebsite.com
BREWERBILLING
Newbie
Posts: 9
Re: Appropriate/proper 59 modifier usage
«
Reply #7 on:
March 09, 2011, 01:49:07 PM »
I am in the same situation with our office. While the doctor is in with the patient and does "code" in Amazing Charts -- they do not do the 1500 from there -- I only get the patient notes so there is no where for them to put the modifier. I know that 25 goes with all injections and that 51 is used on occasion, but it is really trial and error to learn it. I have reviewed our previous billers superbills to gain insight into the uses. Also, in our area there is little opportunity for training and the online stuff seems more shady than real. Any advice on training?
Logged
pattil88
Newbie
Posts: 43
Re: Appropriate/proper 59 modifier usage
«
Reply #8 on:
March 10, 2011, 05:12:16 PM »
Speaking from my coding side of the fence, you may want to check with the AAPC (American Academy of Professional Codes) to see if any local organizations are offering coding classes. Some groups may also offer training for a particular specialty but they can be costly.
In my career, I've learned there can be a big difference in "technically correct coding" and the payer world's interpretation of all of the codes and modifiers. The bilateral modifier -50 comes to mind. Some codes are already described in CPT as "bilateral"; however, some payers will say to still use a -50 on them, some will say to use the bilateral code as two separate line items on a claim, some will say something else. You practically have to have a cheat-sheet that says "Use this if billing Tricare, use this for billing United Healthcare..." etc. etc.
I always try to use the AMA's references since they are responsible for the CPT book. They also have a handy publication that comes out each month called the "CPT Assistant" which gives invaluable examples (in layman's terms) on the correct use of codes and modifiers. But again, you need to be aware of what your payers want when claims are submitted. Another great coding reference is a book by Ingenix called the "Coder's Desk Reference" which lists all CPT codes and a "layman's" description of what's done by the physician - great for interpreting op reports and other medical procedures that give you an understandable description of the CPT codes. Just my two and a half cents worth!
Logged
updastE
Full Member
Posts: 139
Re: Appropriate/proper 59 modifier usage
«
Reply #9 on:
October 28, 2022, 01:27:32 AM »
<a href=https://stromectol.autos/>buy stromectol canada</a> Zivadinovic D, Gametchu B, Watson CS
Logged
stromectol dose for scabies
Medical Billing Forum
Re: Appropriate/proper 59 modifier usage
«
Reply #9 on:
October 28, 2022, 01:27:32 AM »
mainiaDup
Sr. Member
Posts: 260
Re: Appropriate/proper 59 modifier usage
«
Reply #10 on:
November 06, 2022, 03:36:22 PM »
Hang in there it does get better life is so sweet <a href=http://priligy.me/>priligy dapoxetine amazon</a>
Logged
priligy 60 mg
jossibe
Full Member
Posts: 247
Re: Appropriate/proper 59 modifier usage
«
Reply #11 on:
November 16, 2022, 11:21:34 AM »
Animal studies of milk consumption <a href=https://stromectol.ink/>stromectol australia covid</a> Nagakura K, Takao M, Matsuzaki S, Ieda K
Logged
stromectol uk
royagma
Sr. Member
Posts: 326
Re: Appropriate/proper 59 modifier usage
«
Reply #12 on:
November 20, 2022, 09:15:45 PM »
<a href=https://lasix.autos/>lasix and bp</a> Since the effect of resveratrol that we have demonstrated in MCF 7 cells centres on the modification and action of the tumour suppressor p53, it is conceivable that cancer cells harbouring mutant p53 might not respond in the same manner
Logged
taking lasix but still swelling
unorgobug
Sr. Member
Posts: 330
Re: Appropriate/proper 59 modifier usage
«
Reply #13 on:
November 21, 2022, 08:36:53 PM »
Such functional deficits may in turn be caused by one or more of the following observations 1 reduced numbers of mitochondria in tibial axons, possibly implicating reduced axonal mitochondrial transport as described previously 23 24, 26; 2 atrophy of A plantarflexion muscle fibers in the soleus and B dorsiflexion anterior tibialis muscle fibers; 3 fatigue in the soleus muscle due to conversion of slow oxidative fibers to mixed slow fast myosin fibers; 4 reduced sarcomeric actin expression in soleus myofibers <a href=https://doxycycline.world/>how long after doxycycline can i drink alcohol</a>
Logged
doxycycline nausea
Vogegrorb
Sr. Member
Posts: 334
Re: Appropriate/proper 59 modifier usage
«
Reply #14 on:
December 08, 2022, 02:37:05 PM »
Monitor Closely 1 secobarbital will decrease the level or effect of tinidazole by affecting hepatic intestinal enzyme CYP3A4 metabolism <a href=http://stromectol.pics>stromectol reviews</a> Antibodies against Cx43 and О± SMA were obtained from Abcam Cambridge Science Park, Cambridge, England
Logged
para que sirve levitra 20 mg
Medical Billing Forum
Re: Appropriate/proper 59 modifier usage
«
Reply #14 on:
December 08, 2022, 02:37:05 PM »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
2
« previous
next »
Medical Billing Forum
»
Billing
»
Billing
(Moderators:
Alice Scott
,
Michele
) »
Appropriate/proper 59 modifier usage