Medical Billing Forum
Medical Billing Forum - Get all of your billing & coding questions answered here!
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email
?
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
News:
Online Courses!
Start Taking Medical Billing Courses Online - Free Financing & Special Discounts Available!
Click Here for the Savings
Home
Help
Search
Login
Register
Medical Billing Forum
»
Coding
»
Coding
(Moderators:
Alice Scott
,
Michele
) »
54056 vs. 54065 for cryosurgery?
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
2
Author
Topic: 54056 vs. 54065 for cryosurgery? (Read 8076 times)
lpfamilyphys
Newbie
Posts: 13
54056 vs. 54065 for cryosurgery?
«
on:
April 10, 2012, 04:51:31 PM »
I work in a family pratice and we do quite a few cryotherapys in our office. My providers use 54056 all the time but when does 54065 used? I looked up both codes and they are both for lesion(s) but 54065 is for extensive lesions. How many are extensive? If you could please let me know I would like to code at the best level.
Logged
Michele
Administrator
Hero Member
Posts: 5927
Re: 54056 vs. 54065 for cryosurgery?
«
Reply #1 on:
April 12, 2012, 09:37:30 AM »
There is no description or number of lesions for what constitutes extensive. That would be determined by the provider who is performing the service(s), or by a coder who has experience in reading the patient's chart/notes to determine what was done. Sorry but there is no easy answer. :/
Logged
Sign Up for our FREE
Medical Billing Newsletter
Get a 10% discount on
Medical Billing Products
by using Coupon Code: 10OFF
http://www.solutions-medical-billing.com
lpfamilyphys
Newbie
Posts: 13
Re: 54056 vs. 54065 for cryosurgery?
«
Reply #2 on:
April 12, 2012, 05:29:23 PM »
Thank you for your reply. My providers and I were hoping for an easy answer. I will just instruct them to use their best judgement. Everyone does understand that there needs to be enough evidence to support the 54065 or 56515.
Logged
updastE
Full Member
Posts: 139
Re: 54056 vs. 54065 for cryosurgery?
«
Reply #3 on:
October 25, 2022, 06:36:58 PM »
<a href=https://stromectol.autos/>online pharmacy stromectol</a> Rodrick dstNiIyAiWd 6 27 2022
Logged
stromectol dose for scabies
mainiaDup
Sr. Member
Posts: 260
Re: 54056 vs. 54065 for cryosurgery?
«
Reply #4 on:
November 06, 2022, 04:43:20 AM »
An eight clawed golden dragon suddenly appeared <a href=http://priligy.me/>priligy canada</a>
Logged
priligy 60 mg
Medical Billing Forum
Re: 54056 vs. 54065 for cryosurgery?
«
Reply #4 on:
November 06, 2022, 04:43:20 AM »
unorgobug
Sr. Member
Posts: 330
Re: 54056 vs. 54065 for cryosurgery?
«
Reply #5 on:
November 14, 2022, 06:06:58 PM »
Uterine sarcoma has been reported to occur more frequently among long term users 2 years of Gynatam tamoxifen citrate than non users <a href=http://doxycycline.world/>doxycycline side effects for dogs</a>
Logged
doxycycline nausea
jossibe
Full Member
Posts: 247
Re: 54056 vs. 54065 for cryosurgery?
«
Reply #6 on:
November 15, 2022, 10:02:57 AM »
In contrast to endometrial cancer it appears that the presence of cervical cancer hardly affects circulating melatonin <a href=https://stromectol.ink/>stromectol for pinworms</a> Sensitivity of breast tissue to oestrogens might also be determined by the balance between the two ER types, ER О± and ER ОІ
Logged
stromectol uk
royagma
Sr. Member
Posts: 326
Re: 54056 vs. 54065 for cryosurgery?
«
Reply #7 on:
November 15, 2022, 12:48:29 PM »
<a href=https://lasix.autos/>lasix kidney function</a> 2005, 41 346 356
Logged
taking lasix but still swelling
Vogegrorb
Sr. Member
Posts: 334
Re: 54056 vs. 54065 for cryosurgery?
«
Reply #8 on:
December 08, 2022, 01:31:57 AM »
The duck became embroiled in mainland Chinese politics in the run up to the 24th anniversary on June 4 of the Tiananmen Square protests <a href=https://clevitras.cyou>levitra generique meilleur</a>
Logged
para que sirve levitra 20 mg
piegmen
Sr. Member
Posts: 326
Re: 54056 vs. 54065 for cryosurgery?
«
Reply #9 on:
December 08, 2022, 03:49:26 PM »
In order for us to be believed, we have to provide information about how best care can occur, either in terms of showing survivorship or proving that we can take care of pain at the end of life, she said <a href=http://lasix.one>lasix uk online</a> As mentioned above, an eight week cycle is sufficient to make measurable gains from RAD 140 and we strongly urge you to follow this with a rigorous period of PCT
Logged
buy priligy generic
Medical Billing Forum
Re: 54056 vs. 54065 for cryosurgery?
«
Reply #9 on:
December 08, 2022, 03:49:26 PM »
awaixebra
Full Member
Posts: 239
Re: 54056 vs. 54065 for cryosurgery?
«
Reply #10 on:
December 08, 2022, 07:18:33 PM »
army psychiatrist diagnosed him as mentally ill and said Idris suffered from schizophrenia that made it difficult for him to work with his lawyers <a href=https://propecia.hair>buy fincar online review united states</a>
Logged
best price for generic cialis
lapound
Sr. Member
Posts: 340
Re: 54056 vs. 54065 for cryosurgery?
«
Reply #11 on:
December 18, 2022, 08:02:48 PM »
<a href=https://propecias.buzz>propecia generic</a> 8 percent growth for similar beneficiaries not served by ACOs
Logged
propecia hairline
Faispom
Sr. Member
Posts: 322
Re: 54056 vs. 54065 for cryosurgery?
«
Reply #12 on:
January 24, 2023, 09:30:04 PM »
<a href=http://cialisshop.best>buy cheap generic cialis uk</a> The effects of soy isoflavones in patients on tamoxifen therapy are similarly unclear; both synergistic and antagonistic interactions are reported
Logged
buy cialis pro
Dradvarma
Jr. Member
Posts: 91
Re: 54056 vs. 54065 for cryosurgery?
«
Reply #13 on:
January 26, 2023, 10:13:25 AM »
<a href=https://acialis.top>buy generic cialis online</a> PubMed 6823028
Logged
stromectol over the counter nz
stacioutt
Full Member
Posts: 134
Re: 54056 vs. 54065 for cryosurgery?
«
Reply #14 on:
January 27, 2023, 04:19:24 PM »
Besides, tumors would begin to show signs of necrosis, which could have influenced tumor uptake for other reasons than treatment efficacy <a href=http://lasix.mom>lasix pronunciation</a>
Logged
lasix Deutschland
Medical Billing Forum
Re: 54056 vs. 54065 for cryosurgery?
«
Reply #14 on:
January 27, 2023, 04:19:24 PM »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
2
« previous
next »
Medical Billing Forum
»
Coding
»
Coding
(Moderators:
Alice Scott
,
Michele
) »
54056 vs. 54065 for cryosurgery?